Saturday, August 31, 2013

Obama Arms Syrian Rebels; Disarms Americans

President Barack Obama is reportedly still making his case about the one-thousand plus victims of chemical gassing in the Syrian civil war, attempting to justify an attack of that country to "punish" the Syrian regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons against its citizens.

And he is working feverishly to supply arms to Syrian Rebels, as was noted by Reuters on July 23rd:

"...The White House announced in June that it would offer military aid to vetted groups of Syrian rebels after two years of balking at directly sending arms to the opposition....'We have been working with Congress to overcome some of the concerns that they initially had, and we believe that those concerns have been addressed and that we will now be able to proceed,' a source familiar with the administration's thinking told Reuters on condition of anonymity..."

The Reuters article states:

"...The timeline was unclear, but supporters of the rebels hope the deliveries of U.S.-provided arms will start in August....They hope for 'a large number of small weapons' such as rifles and basic anti-tank weapons, said Louay Sakka, a co-founder of the Syrian Support Group, which backs the Free Syrian Army fighting Assad...'..."

And yet, since then, Obama has acted to restrict and to counter the Constitutional Right of Americans to bear arms.  As Fox News reported a few days ago:

"...The Obama administration unexpectedly announced two new gun control measures on Thursday, including one that would curb the import of military surplus weapons -- in a move that could anger collectors....Vice President Biden announced the new measures Thursday morning. The new rules, announced while Washington was otherwise focused on the crisis in Syria, took the form of executive actions, which President Obama added to the list of 23 steps the White House already determined the president could take on his own..."

And it appears that gun control measures that the Obama Administration cannot institute via congressional legislation, will be issued as decrees by way of Executive Orders.

"...the White House has completed or made significant progress on all but one of the 23 executive actions Obama had previously ordered in January..."

It is clear, that while the Obama argues the need for rebels of his choosing in a foreign country to be armed so they can oppose a tyrannical government, he yet continues his attempt to disarm Americans and to negate and remove from U.S. patriots their ability to defend themselves against tyranny here at home.

It is a factor highlighted by the controversy of U.S. further involvement in Syria, and one that is yet not getting the coverage it merits in media.

Vanguard of Freedom

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Syria's Assad Will Get An Advantage From An Attack or Even The Threat Of An Attack By The U.S.

To the point:

1.  Assad will rally protests in the streets against an Imperialist U.S. attacking an Arab Country in the Middle East.

2.  Assad will "call-in" his "alliance" cards with Russia and China.

3.  The Assad regime will be "resolved" against the West and accuse the U.S. of meddling in Middle East/Syria affairs.

4.  Assad will accuse the U.S. of wanting a foot-hold in the Middle East, claim a conspiracy of U.S. and Israel against Syria, and call for "Arab Unity" against foreign invaders in the way that was promoted by Abdel Nasser.

5  Extended Note:

The Muslim Middle East strategy is to own both sides of a conflict, and the manifestation of this is the apparency of Sunni and Shia conflicts throughout the world.  There are Sunni-Shia conflicts, but both factions, are in the end, Muslim.  Muslim culture accepts the conflict, but understand that in the end, Muslims will unite against non-Muslims to defeat their enemies. The "conflict" strategy involves trapping opponents in one or another of the factions, to bring them into the fight and then fight a war of attrition against its "ally."

Obama has stepped into this ruse, and/or due to his loyalties and political preferences is complicit in the "trap," and with his continuing support of the "Arab Spring" is perpetuating U.S. involvement in the Arab quagmire.  U.S. involvement in the Syrian conflict, and any other conflict in Muslim countries will result only in results similar to the outcome of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama has shown in the past that he is not enamored with Israel, to say the least.  A U.S. attack on Syria will prompt "justified" retaliation against Israel.

Israel will not sit back and be attacked, and when it launches retaliatory attacks against Israel's attackers, Arab sentiment will solidify against the U.S. and Israel.

Just today the Brits pulled out of any agreement to attack Syria. So did Jordan.

The Russians, who have had a minimal footprint in the Middle East, will capitalize on the U.S. attack by securing a larger beach head in Syria, and then in the Middle East.

Russian, Chinese, and Iranian Influence will increase due to the U.S. Threat or Actual attack.

The Russian, Chinese, and Iranian propaganda will tout a victory for their axis, and launch a stronger campaign (than they have now) against U.S. financial interests in the region, including an attack on U.S. petro-dollars, and the significances tied to that phenomenon internationally.

It is unfathomable that a U.S. President and/or his advisors and anyone in the Obama administration has not weighed any of these factors.  Assuming that they have, then they are deliberately setting up the U.S. for a military, political, and financial gargantuan loss.

The fears of World War III are probably unwarranted, unless one is counting on madness in the Russian and Chinese spheres.  However, a holocaust of political, military, and financial loss will ensue against the U.S. because of this Obama "blunder."

Please note that this "blunder" is in keeping with the Obama objective to make the U.S. equal to its enemies, by weakening the U.S. militarily, financially, and politically.

Monday, August 26, 2013

Why the NSA Scandal is Actually A Hoax...

Please note the statement by Senator Frank Church in 1975.

Yes. 1975.  The capability was "perfected" in 1975.  He even cautioned using that capability against Americans.

So, how then is the NSA capability to "intercept communications" new in 2013?

How is it that it is a spectacular and devastating revelation that this surveillance capability is not only being carried out, but "exposed" by a whistle-blower?

Was it because it was not common knowledge?  Was it because people forgot what Frank Church said in 1975?

It is correct to suspect that you have been duped into believing that a program is TOP SECRET, and that it was then LEAKED, and that now a WHISTLEBLOWER is being pursued and has to get ASYLUM in a foreign country.  The argument pro and con, is that the perpetrator is either a hero or a traitor.

How is it that a program that was openly spoken about and known about in 1975, now in 2013 a Top Secret program that is being REVEALED, and is touted as exposing classified information to the tune of endangering our national security?

One can justify or try to make sense of this anomaly by asserting that computers and modern technology developments increase the impact of such capabilities, but that still does not negate that these programs have been known about openly since 1975.

In this light, since the "scandal" is exposed as a farce, what, then, is really going on?

Your guess is as good as mine.

But an informed calculation is possibly that one (or several) of Comrade Vlad Putin's KGB / G.R.U. (soviet military intelligence) moles has been outed, and a ruse was necessary to get him back to Mother Russia, safe and sound for debriefing.

Consider the perp's "history."  HERE...

Consider then, the U.S. President's "Leanings," and this scenario becomes all too plausible, even to the point of the ruse being facilitated by "both sides" to ensure that appearances are kept up.

Those "appearances," for the uninitiated, are the fragile facades that must be held in place to continue that pretense that you have, at least, a semblance of a Constitutional Republic, and not a "police state," so that a Production Class of serfs can be counted on for tribute to be paid to a Criminal Class of "Managers" that have not a clue, nor care about how to manage the societies they pretend to govern.

Vanguard of Freedom