Wednesday, February 15, 2017

More Fake News .. This time about a "Russian Spy Ship"



In a Fox News report it was reported today that a Russian "Spy Ship" (the Viktor Leonov) was spotted 40 miles closer to the U.S. and not far from a Navy submarine base in Connecticut.)  That was, the report said, according to a U.S. official.

That was the "lead" in the story.  Then the report said the ship remained in international waters, but not before mentioning that the ship bore surface-to-air missles, but, however, its main function "...is to intercept communications and collect data on U.S. Navy sonar capability..."

The implication is that we are being spied on by Russia right off our coast.  What the report by Lucas Tomlinson does not tell you is that any information that could be obtained by said ship can be obtained by any low level spy operating in Washington D.C., either by walking into a government official's office that holds the information they need, or by computer hacking, or by simply asking one of the traitors that purport to act on Americans' behalf in our intelligence agencies.

Russian spy "trawlers," which at one time were operated as fishing vessels, routinely buzzed our coast lines during the "cold war."  They were then a dead give-away, because the so-called fishing vessels were arrayed with a multitude of antennas that no normal fishing boat would have sported at that time.

The U.S. did the same in the past and probably does the same today.  One such incident was the U.S.S. Pueblo, which was captured by North Korea.  Another such U.S. spy ship was the U.S.S. Liberty, which was severely damaged by Israel,  supposedly attacked by Israel because the ship refused to identify itself. That was in 1967.

U.S. spying, does not make Russian spying ok.  Neither does it make ok Russian military incursions into our territory.  Spying is, of course, "routine."

What is wrong with that story, however, is that it promotes the pretense of Russian aggression, possibly to make U.S. defenses look vulnerable or weak.

Current U.S. defense capability, one could easily discover (by googling, if one were so inclined), can obliterate any intruder into U.S. territory within seconds of detection, and the capability includes the obliteration of multiple "invading" units.

But the more interesting omission of this story is that, while there may be a Russian spy ship off the Coast of the U.S., there are multiple agresssors with spying capabilities, much closer than "off our coastline,"  mainly the embassies of unfriendly nations in Washington D.C.  If you happen to be a tourist in our capital, be sure to take the tour and check out the array of antennas on each of those embassies, and perhaps you will then speculate on the army of operatives and agents  assigned to those embassies and their "American" assets that operate right under the noses of the CIA and the FBI, not to mention our many military intelligence agencies.

You might even be prompted to ask yourself if that scruffy bloake sitting next to you on the bench at the Washington Memorial, eating a hot dog, is actually a spy working for China.  Ponder that.

Of course, that pales in significance, when illuminated against the back-drop of the former "administration" of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, which acted openly against U.S. interests and divulged our major secrets to our enemies, and are now using their "insider" influence to desperately undermine the current administration.

Maybe a Russian spy trawler off the coast of the U.S. is actually an improvement in U.S. security.

Thursday, September 10, 2015

"Hidden Cameras Capture Clinton Campaign Staff in Nevada not Only Skirting the Law but Mocking it"



A James O'Keefe, Project Veritas Video, released today appears to show Hillary Clinton Nevada campaign staff and volunteers ignoring and violating Nevada voter registration laws.

An article accompanying the release says "Hidden Cameras Capture Clinton Campaign Staff in Nevada not Only Skirting the Law but Mocking it."

The video describes a Clinton campaign attorney, Christina Gupana of Las Vegas, advising campaign workers that they should "...do whatever you can, whatever you canget away with just do it..."

According to the article:

"...We uncovered a clear theme within the Nevada Clinton campaign, when it comes to the law: ask for forgiveness not permission. Phillip Kim, a staff organizer for Hillary for America was captured on hidden camera saying: 'ask for forgiveness not for permission ... Courtney Kravitz, a Hillary for America Fellow was caught stating to one of Project Veritas Action’s undercover journalists that 'I mean we kind of abide by the like ask for forgiveness type of thing.' And Harrison Lee, another Hillary for America Fellow was caught on hidden camera admitting: 'Typically the style of campaigning that we do is like, we just ask, do they support Hillary Clinton.  And if we’re not allowed to do that, then we ask for forgiveness.' ..."

Another account details the following:

In a discussion captured on hidden camera, campaign worker Henry Engelstein explained to Gupana and Lee that they were chastised by a librarian for openly displaying a Clinton sign while conducting voter registration in the library ... According to Engelstein, 'she came out with the Nevada statute books and opens it up and starts reading the statute about how you’re allowed to get voter registration … it says pretty explicitly here in the statute that this sort of action is prohibited.  So I don’t care if you do voter registration but you can’t have the Hillary stuff.' ... 'That was like the saddest day,' stated Lee, to which Engelstein cavalierly replied 'Dude she had the f**king book.' ... Gupana subsequently advises her fellow campaign workers to 'just like hide all that stuff and like.' ..."

Project Veritas President, James O'Keefe summed it up:

"...The widespread corruption throughout all levels of the Clinton campaign is a disease ... Just as with her State Department email scandal, the culture of Clinton’s presidential campaign seems clear: break the law - then ask for forgiveness only if you get caught...”

See the VIDEO here:











Wednesday, September 9, 2015



Do you want to know how Obama got support for the Iran Deal from Congress?

You already know how.

Establishment Congressmen and Senators have been doing this since they got a pot full of your income tax gold to party with, a long time ago.

Here's how it works. (remember?)

They get in the Congressional Representative and Senator Welfare line, and then they hold out for as much as they can, for as long as they can, until they get the favors, the contracts, the pork, the kick-backs, or the acknowledgements, and/or promise of political or election support that they want.  And when they get it they vote in favor of whatever measure the booty is being doled out for.

So those who signed on to the bogus Iran deal traded money, power or favor for it.

In other words:  Ca-ching!

That's how it's done.

That's how the "Establishment Republicans" stabbed the Constitutionalists and the Tea Party in the back after this last election.

Ca-ching!

What's there to "get" from the Iran deal?

Oil contracts and the adjacent industry and infrastructure "economy" and everything that goes with it. You heard the talking points.  The "deal" is going to "free up"  Billions.  Zillions!  And those that sold out are going to happily collect when the bill is due.

You know how this is done.

Hillary worked for four years to set up a similar scheme over at her "Foundation," in which governments and mega zillionaires donated to her "charities" .... in exchange for what?

Top Secret information traded at top dollar, and access to anything and everything the U.S. would dole out under a Hillary presidency.

Ca-ching!

Feel duped lately?

I wonder why.












Tuesday, September 9, 2014

The ISIS Long Arm of Terror...

The THREAT MATRIX is reporting  the terrorist organization, ISIS, and its activities in numerous countries since January 2013, in direct contradiction to attempts to downplay or minimize the security threat of that terror group.

Says TM:

"..The list ... organized by continent and then alphabetically by country, is not exhaustive. Nonetheless, its extensiveness indicates the global reach of the IS, even if the reported activity does not consist of spectacular attacks..."

Lisa Lundquist @ TM tells us that:
"...some Western pundits have argued that the terror organization poses only a distant threat, not a near one. They have claimed that the Islamic State's goals are mainly territorial and focused on the Middle East, as compared to al Qaeda's, which are transnational and focused on attacking the West. On June 30, the US State Department referred to the ISIS' strategy as that of creating a regional caliphate...That general view was fairly widely held until recently, when the Islamic State executed two American hostages, which brought home to the West that its citizens are at risk. But in addition to committing shocking crimes in Syria and Iraq against civilians, security forces, and Western captives, the group has also developed an international following. The Islamic State's growing international presence demonstrates the dangerous fallacy of the argument that the group has primarily only regional goals..."
And, she writes:  "...even without regard to official statements by Islamist groups endorsing, opposing, or hedging on the Islamic State, the fact remains that Islamic State fighters and supporters are conducting operations well outside the confines of Iraq and Syria..."

See the entire article HERE @ Threat Matrix....


SEE More News / Red Clix HEADLINERS Here...


Sunday, July 27, 2014

The Politics of Polarization

President Obama meets with President Molina of Guatemala, President Hernandez of Honduras, and President Ceren of El Salvador; speaks about Illegal immigrant issue...


This weekend Obamistas and the Socialist Liberal media have launched a precise tactic of political and cultural polarization in advance of the 2014 election cycle by focusing on divisive issues that will attempt to get out the Democrat vote, cast their opposition as uncompassionate  reactionaries, and endear the Obama regime to Hispanics by championing amnesty, legalization, and citizenship for illegal aliens.

Here begins the Obamista propaganda machine:

"...Even as President Obama grapples with the crisis of immigrant children arriving at the Southwest border, White House officials are laying the groundwork for a large-scale expansion of immigrant rights that would come by executive action within weeks..."  That's according to a Parson, Bennett, Mascaro story in the Los Angeles Times.

The article says that White House Officials signaled strongly on Friday that "...Obama's move would shield from deportation large numbers of immigrants living in the country illegally, as advocacy groups have demanded..."  And it cites that roughly 5 million of the estimated 11 million people who entered the country without legal authorization or overstayed their visas could be protected under a leading option the White House is considering.

The L.A. Times article quotes senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer telling reporters the Obama move will come by the end of the summer, and predicts that will prompt a major clash with congressional Republicans, citing also that that some White House officials "...appeared to relish the prospect that the GOP might overreach in its response and act in a politically self-destructive manner..."

The article states that:
"...The White House is entertaining a range of possibilities that would speed up deportations in some cases but forestall them in many others...Obama could use his executive powers to expedite deportations in response to the current border crisis, in an effort to clear the large numbers of unaccompanied minors gathering daily in the Rio Grande Valley in south Texas...At the same time, he seems likely to act to prevent deportations of many of the immigrants already living, working and raising children in the U.S..."
The L.A. Times article says that Pfeiffer told reporters that he would not discount the possibility that Republicans would seek to impeach Obama over his next immigration moves, and that "...references to impeachment at the White House on Friday suggest that administration officials are trying to shape the political battleground in advance — portraying Republicans as obstructionist before launching a broad-sweeping executive action on a front where conservative sensitivities are particularly keen: immigration policy..." And it says that the "...campaign arm of the House Democratic leadership began a fundraising drive featuring Pfeiffer's impeachment forecast within hours of his making it..."

The Obama administration media blitz and the consequent propaganda blast by its media minions reveals their efforts to paint the landscape in their favor, utilizing the tactic of framing a scenario according to their Socialist agenda.  The propaganda effort is the tail-end of a tactic that includes a coordinated policy that would attract illegal aliens to this country, along with the announcement of a refusal to enforce immigration laws (arrest and deportation), prompting a massive influx of illegal aliens, culminating in the utilization of illegal alien "children" as propaganda pawns to achieve the political objective of legalization and/or amnesty.

The clamor that the illegal alien invasion is a failure of the Obama Administration, and that it is a fiasco for which he is at fault is folly.  Results  demonstrate that Obama's  "inaction" is actually part of a scenario that has been staged for political gain and that the stages of that agenda continue to unfold according to plan.

By the way, there's another article in TIME Magazine that parallels the article in the L.A. Times. (See that HERE).

The stages of "The Obamista 2014 Political Plan" appear to be according to the following:

1.  Announce broadly that it is ok to come to the U.S. illegally because immigration laws will not be enforced.

2.  Inform those who are coming to surrender themselves to authorities so that they can be processed toward legalization.

3.  Process those who have been detained or who have surrendered to authorities and release them on their own recognizance.

4.  Promote this as a "humanitarian crisis."

5.  Use illegal alien children as a propaganda measure to obtain sympathy and to cast opposition to legalization/amnesty in a negative light.

6.  Use these issues to fuel efforts to get out the vote in mid term elections.

7.  Use issues to inflame opposition and prompt calls for impeachment of Obama and then use the response to intimidate efforts towards impeachment from the opposition, and to cast those who propose impeachment in a negative light. This will cause a split of Republicans into pro and anti-impeachment factions.

8. Continue "legalization" efforts for illegal aliens, thus announcing further that it's ok to come and "you won't get deported."

These tactics are meant to get a reaction from the opposition.  It is a Marxist tactic, gleaned from "the dialectic."  Specifically, the "activists" create an issue to cause a violent or extreme reaction from the opposition.  When they get the reaction, they point out and organize opposition to it by pointing out how "reactionary" their opposition is.  This accomplishes two things.  It helps to "organize" and get into action those of one camp, while causing the other camp to react, and to possibly become divided, and to be cast  in a negative light.

This is why you see leftists in demonstrations throwing rocks, molotov cocktails, causing riots: to cause a violent or extreme reaction from the opposition.  It is meant to inflame and to upset. When police or soldiers or a "militia" react to the inflammatory actions, the finger pointing begins about how oppressive and mean the opposition is.

It is one harmonic down from terrorism. Terrorism is the more extreme version.  The purposes are the same.  Cause a breakdown, a wedge, an upset by attacking the stability of the opposition.  The actions are meant to destabilize, to get the opposition off balance,  to cause a violent and/or extreme reaction, and to divide, topple, defeat and conquer.

As an example, here is a "conservative" that is already capitulating, already being divided. (Click Here)

What's the antidote?

Do not get terrorized.  Do not get destabilized. Do not get flustered, disorganized, upset and do not extremely respond.

Instead restore stability. Build, fortify, secure, and advance your own cause.  Attack the opposition strategically. UNDERSTAND the tactics of the Left.

In the case of the Obamistas, label them for what they are.  They are in collusion with human trafficking, abusing children for political gain,  making them come here via sociopathic cartels in hostile environments and conditions for political gain is even worse than human trafficking. Etc. Etc.

Get the conservative vote out for the elections.  Staying home on election day is not working.





Thursday, June 19, 2014

CONGRESS REPORTS: IRS Too Dumb To Be Non-Partisan

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has issued a report that says the IRS is too dumb to be non-partisan.  They said this, not in so many words, but that appears to be the gist of the report.



The report says that the IRS staff heard their boss, Barack Obama, bullying conservatives, calling conservative groups "...'shadowy' entities with 'innocuous' and 'benign-sounding' names that 'are running millions of dollars of attack ads against Democratic candidates'..."  And then the IRS, upon hearing this and other Presidential condemnations of his critics, decided to target Conservatives and Tea Party groups for special repressive measures.

The report says specifically:

"...President Barack Obama--a highly celebrated speaker noted for his oratory--exerts this power with uncommon vigor. President Obama's ability to command the rapt attention of the national news media, and by extension the American people, has become his most effective and favored rhetorical tool.  With his Bully Pulpit, President Obama wields the power to singlehandedly shape the national dialogue.  In this case, President Obama's Bully Pulpit led to the Internal Revenue Service's targeting of conservative tax-exempt applicants..."

The report specifies:

"...In the months after the President's State of the Union Address, he kept up the [negative] rhetorical assault as he railed against the decision [Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission] in campaign-style speeches across the country.  In these speeches, the President called conservative groups 'shadowy' entities with 'innocuous' and 'benign-sounding' names that 'are running millions of dollars of attack ads against Democratic candidates.'  Calling them 'phony' and 'front groups,' the President urged a 'fix' to the Citizens United decision, which he believed allowed these nefarious groups to 'pose' as nonprofits.  The President's allies in Congress and elsewhere echoed this call, working aggressively to delegitimize the Court's decision and Constitutional protections for non profit political speech..."

The report raises some very crucial and critical questions.  First, obviously, IRS employees appear to not be required, upon being hired, to swear an oath to uphold the Constitution and to protect the nation against enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Additionally the intelligence quotient of IRS employment candidates appears to not be calculated into the hiring process.

We are invited to conclude the following:

"...Put simply, as the President's political rhetoric drove the national dialogue and shaped public opinion, the IRS received and responded to the political stimuli..."

According to this reasoning, the robo-paths at the IRS obviously are incapable of independent, responsible, thought, and are incapable of being accountable for horrific Constitutional violations. To wit:

"... A review of evidence available to the Committee substantiates this conclusion.  In February 2010, the IRS identified and elevated the initial conservative tax-exempt applications due to concerns about media attention surrounding the Tea party.  Likewise in September 2010, in response to an article in a tax-law journal, former IRS official Lois Lerner initiated a 'c4 project' to assess the political activity of certain nonprofits..."

Isn't that just peachy?

"...In October 2010, after reading news reports that nonprofits were becoming increasingly active in political speech following [the Supreme Court Decision] Citizens United, the Justice Department arranged a meeting with the IRS to discuss the decision's effect on campaign finance law.  Most tellingly, Lerner [then head of the IRS non-profit section] talked in October 2010 about political pressure on the IRS to 'fix the problem' posed by Citizens United, saying that 'everyone is up in arms' about the decision and that 'everybody is screaming at [The IRS] right now: 'fix it now before the election.'..."

The report says that defenders of the IRS (principally Democrats) have sought to downplay the IRS wrongdoing:

"...For it to be scandal, they said, the President himself must be personally involved.  For it to merit attention, they argued, the White House must have ordered the targeting.  For the public outrage to be warranted, these Democrats alluded, there must be a direct link from the Oval Office to the IRS.  Hiding behind these straw men, the defenders of the Obama Administration claimed that the absence of a direct order to target conservatives necessarily meant that there was no political element to the IRS targeting..."

The conclusion?

"...The Committees investigation shows that the IRS targeting was political. It was political in both its genesis and its effect.  The IRS targeting was the result of political pressure on the agency to 'fix the problem' of nonprofit political speech.  This political pressure was generated by campaign-style rhetoric from President Obama and his allies in opposition to the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision  and so-called 'shadowy' groups 'posing' as nonprofits.  As a result of the IRS targeting, hundreds of tax exempt applicants were singled out for scrutiny on undeniably political grounds--that is, they intended to engage in political speech...

The report stresses a "...rhetorical barrage orchestrated by the President to delegitimize Citizens United and vilify the conservative nonprofit groups the White House feared would be helped by it..."

The report says that "...it is apparent that the IRS targeting of conservative tax-exempt applicants initiated and progressed in the context of intense political pressure led by the President for action on politically active nonprofits.  It is beyond dispute that the President's political rhetoric contributed to IRS efforts that resulted in the IRS's targeting of conservative tax-exempt groups because of their political beliefs..."  But it does not address the inadequacies of IRS staff and their fault in failing to uphold Constitutional law, Constitutional protections, and their oath of office.  Nor does the report hold accountable the IRS employees responsible for those failures.

While it is clear that their boss certainly targeted his critics, IRS employees are supposed to be above the fray; they are supposed to be non-partisan.  When, up and down the chain of command, not one of them steps forward to be the adult in the room, the patriot, the upholder of the Constitution, that agency is compromised and must be dismantled at once, and another agency put in its place.  The IRS is mandated by a Constitutional amendment, but nowhere in its establishment were violations of our founding documents authorized, condoned or sanctioned, nor are there clauses or articles that set aside the Constitution in order for it to exist.  If there are, then the Constitution by default must prevail.

Today, however, it is not enough to minimally withhold funds from such a despicable agency that so egregiously rips apart our Constitutional fundamentals. It must be stripped of any authority and function from the inside out, and a more effective income collecting entity put in its place that does not penalize citizens or their production.

The President's minions are more interested in keeping their jobs safe, rather than upholding our Constitution, and must face the consequences.  The agency must be replaced, and if another is put in its place, it must be devoid of any power of repression.



Texans Not Waiting For Obama To Secure Border

Texas Governor Rick Perry is not holding his breath waiting for help from Obama's feds to secure the Texas border against a veritable invasion of illegal aliens...




In a media dispatch yesterday the governor's office announced that Rick Perry, along with David Dewhurst, the Texas Lt. Governor, and Joe Straus, the Lone Star State's Speaker of the House, had directed the Texas Department of Public Safety "...to immediately begin law enforcement surge operations on the Texas-Mexico border to combat the flood of illegal immigration into the state in the absence of adequate federal resources to secure the border. State leaders have authorized DPS to fund border security operations at approximately $1.3 million per week..."

Perry says Texas can't afford to wait for Washington to act on this crisis and that we "...will not sit idly by while the safety and security of our citizens are threatened...Until the federal government recognizes the danger it's putting our citizens in by its inaction to secure the border, Texas law enforcement must do everything they can to keep our citizens and communities safe..."

The Texas Lt. Governor was no less forceful than Perry. Dewhurst said:
"...The federal government has abdicated its responsibility to secure the border and protect this country from the consequences of illegal immigration, but as Texans we know how to lead in areas where Washington has failed... Last year DPS conducted Operation Strong Safety and achieved astounding results. Crime rates related to drugs, cartels, transnational gangs, and illegal border activity plummeted because of the resources we allocated to stop illegal entry at the border. It's time to make this type of presence on the border permanent..."

According to the Governor's office calculations, The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (USCBP) has apprehended more illegal immigrants in the Rio Grande Valley in the first eight months of the current federal fiscal year (over 160,000) than it did for all of fiscal year 2013 (154,453). In May 2014 alone, USCBP reported apprehending more than 1,100 illegal immigrants per day in the Rio Grande Valley.  "...This year, like last year, more than half of the individuals apprehended at the Texas-Mexico border by USCBP are from countries other than Mexico. Additionally, 34,000 unaccompanied alien children (UAC) have been apprehended in Texas so far this year, with estimates that number will reach 90,000 by the end of the fiscal year. By comparison, 28,352 UAC were apprehended in fiscal year 2013..."

In a communique to the Director of the Department of Public Safety, Colonel Steven C. McCraw, Texas officials directed the DPS to plan and execute a surge operation of increased law enforcement in Texas border counties.  They said: "...You are authorized to utilize all existing appropriated funds toward this operation...To the extent necessary, we will utilize our authority as governor and as co-chairs of the Legislative Budget Board to facilitate adjustments to the DPS budget until next session.  The cost for this operation will need to be addressed by the next legislature in the supplemental appropriations bill..."

The Texas Governor said on Tuesday that the immigration crisis is "... an absolute overflowing mess..."  He appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity telling him that "...there has been some success in shutting down illegal activities with these immigration surges, but the states just don’t have the resources for this situation..."

On Hannity Perry said, "...Number one, it’s not the state’s responsibility to be dealing with this issue. We’re doing our part to make sure we can keep our citizens as safe as we can. But the federal government is just absolutely failing. We either have an incredibly inept administration or they’re in on this somehow..."

The immigration fiasco was described by Arizona Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, also on "Hannity" (on Monday): "...You talk about the Border Patrol, they’re too busy changing diapers and not going after dope peddlers and illegal immigrants,” Arpaio said. “I think the president knew this was going to happen, so it’s going to help him on his executive orders if Congress doesn’t take this mission up. And it might backfire. It might backfire because of the inhumane situation..." That was an echo of a report on "The Kelly File," that reported, "...The crisis at the southern border is worsening by the day, as we heard on The Kelly File that almost half of Border Patrol agents are off patrols because they're need to do paperwork. There are not enough agents to handle the enormous influx of illegal immigrant children that have to be cared for at processing centers..."


CBS quoted Texas Congressman Henry Cuellar from Laredo on June 8, "...if you’re just looking at the lower Rio Grande Valley we’re getting about 1,200 people a day. Over 70 percent of them are not from Mexico but from other places and 300 to 400 of them are young people coming in without parents...Almost 40 percent of the Border Patrol Agents are not at the border they’re actually filling out paperwork, transporting, feeding, moving these folks around..."

Texans are initiating their efforts with the understanding of the magnitude of the problem.

Texas officials told the DPS director:  "...Clearly, committing more of your resources will not end the humanitarian issues on the border, nor is it a complete solution to what is ultimately a federal responsibility. But the professional law enforcement resources at the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) can reduce crime, ensure the safety of Texas citizens and support the strained resources of local law enforcement and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection..."